Tuna Fisheries and Forced Labor: A Deep Dive into Eco-Label Shortcomings

In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew Lewin dives into the topic of ecolabels in seafood consumption. Picture yourself enjoying a delicious sushi lunch, knowing you've made an eco-conscious choice by selecting certified sustainable seafood. Andrew discusses the importance of following organizations like Seafood Watch and the Marine Stewardship Council to ensure responsible seafood sourcing. However, he also addresses the imperfections of these ecolabels and raises critical questions about their effectiveness and future. Join the conversation as Andrew explores whether these ecolabels can improve or if we need to rethink our reliance on them.

Tune in for insights on how to better protect our oceans through informed choices.

Link to article:

Oceana article: https://oceana.org/press-releases/tuna-vessels-using-forced-labor-under-msc-ecolabel/

Natasha Nakamura article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44183-024-00074-6

Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program.

 

Do you want to join my Ocean Community?
Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp

 

Sign up for our Newsletter: http://www.speakupforblue.com/newsletter

 

Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI

Connect with Speak Up For Blue:
Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf
Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue
Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc
YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and Its Shortcomings in Tracking Forced Labor in Tuna Fisheries

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) is an organization that certifies fisheries as sustainable and responsible, providing consumers with an eco-label that signifies adherence to specific environmental and ethical standards. However, recent discussions have highlighted significant shortcomings in the MSC's ability to effectively track forced labor within tuna fisheries.

Reliance on Self-Reported Information

One of the primary issues with the MSC's certification process is its reliance on self-reported information from trade associations, manufacturers, and distributors. This means that the MSC does not require direct reporting from vessel owners or operators, who are the entities where forced labor is most likely to occur. As noted in a recent podcast episode, researcher Katrina Nakamura, who analyzed data from tuna vessels, found that 74% of MSC-certified sustainable tuna was untraceable to the vessel owners or fishing employers. This lack of traceability raises serious concerns about the integrity of the MSC certification.

Lack of Monitoring and Accountability

The MSC's standards do not include provisions for monitoring the actual conditions aboard fishing vessels. There are no requirements for fisheries observers or human rights monitors to be present on these vessels, which means that the MSC is not actively verifying the claims made by the self-reporting entities. This creates a significant loophole, allowing vessels associated with human trafficking and forced labor to benefit from the MSC eco-label without any accountability.

Katrina Nakamura's research revealed that it was relatively easy for her to identify multiple cases of forced labor on vessels certified by the MSC. She highlighted that if she could find this information quickly, it is hard to believe that the MSC could be unaware of these issues. This suggests a troubling lack of diligence on the part of the MSC in ensuring that its certified fisheries are genuinely free from forced labor practices.

Implications for Consumers

For consumers, the MSC label is often seen as a guarantee of ethical and sustainable seafood. However, the findings discussed in the podcast indicate that this trust may be misplaced. The MSC has acknowledged concerns about forced labor and human rights abuses in the tuna supply chain but continues to advise consumers to choose MSC-certified tuna as a way to reduce exposure to these risks. This advice is problematic, as it does not reflect the reality of the situation, where many certified fisheries may still be complicit in labor abuses.

Call for Improvement

The podcast emphasizes the need for the MSC to implement more robust measures to protect vulnerable workers in the fishing industry. This includes requiring that vessel owners be identified and screened against publicized lists of implicated vessels, as well as establishing stricter monitoring protocols to ensure compliance with human rights standards.

In conclusion, while the MSC plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable fishing practices, its current approach to tracking forced labor within tuna fisheries is inadequate. By relying on self-reported information and failing to monitor conditions aboard vessels, the MSC risks undermining its own credibility and the trust of consumers who seek to make ethical choices in their seafood consumption. Addressing these shortcomings is essential for ensuring that the MSC can fulfill its mission of promoting sustainability and protecting human rights in the fishing industry.

The Shortcomings of Ecolabels in Tuna Fisheries: A Closer Look at Forced Labor

In a recent episode of the "How to Protect the Ocean" podcast, host Andrew Lewin delves into the critical issue of forced labor within tuna fisheries, particularly focusing on the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and its certification processes. While ecolabels like the MSC are designed to assure consumers that the seafood they purchase is sustainably sourced and ethically produced, the reality is far more complex and troubling.

The Role of Ecolabels

Ecolabels serve as a guide for consumers who want to make responsible choices regarding their seafood consumption. They are intended to indicate that the seafood has been sourced from fisheries that adhere to sustainable practices and respect human rights. The MSC, for instance, certifies fisheries based on self-reported information from trade associations, manufacturers, and distributors. This system is meant to ensure that the entire supply chain—from fishing vessels to processing companies—operates under ethical standards.

The Problem of Forced Labor

However, the podcast highlights significant gaps in the MSC's reporting and monitoring processes, particularly concerning forced labor. Katrina Nakamura's recent publication in Nature reveals alarming statistics: 74% of MSC-certified sustainable tuna was found to be untraceable to the vessel owners or fishing employers. This lack of traceability raises serious questions about the conditions under which the fish are caught.

Nakamura's research indicates that approximately 128,000 fishers are trapped in forced labor aboard fishing vessels. These individuals often work under hazardous conditions, receive little to no pay, and are subjected to physical and psychological abuse. The podcast emphasizes that many of these vessels are certified by the MSC, which claims to uphold high standards for human rights and sustainability.

Self-Reporting and Accountability

One of the most concerning aspects of the MSC's certification process is its reliance on self-reported information. The podcast points out that the MSC does not screen vessels against publicized lists of labor abuses, which allows companies associated with human trafficking and forced labor to benefit from the ecolabel. This creates a loophole where unethical practices can go unchecked, undermining the very purpose of the ecolabel.

Andrew Lewin stresses that while the MSC is undertaking a monumental task in certifying fisheries globally, it must improve its standards and monitoring processes. The absence of on-board inspections and human rights observers means that the MSC is not adequately addressing the realities of forced labor in the fishing industry.

Recommendations for Improvement

To combat these issues, Oceana is advocating for world governments to adopt the Global Charter of Fisheries Transparency. This charter outlines essential policy priorities to improve fisheries management and address human rights abuses at sea. It includes measures such as collecting data on the conditions of fishing vessel crews and making this information publicly available while protecting personal identities.

In the United States, Oceana is pushing for the expansion of the Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP) to cover all seafood imports, as currently only 45% are monitored. This expansion would help ensure that all seafood production standards, including those related to forced labor, are enforced.

Conclusion

The podcast episode serves as a wake-up call for consumers and organizations alike. While ecolabels like the MSC aim to promote sustainable and ethical seafood consumption, the reality is that significant shortcomings exist in their monitoring and reporting processes. As consumers, it is crucial to remain informed and advocate for better practices within the seafood industry. The fight against forced labor in tuna fisheries is not just about protecting the ocean; it is also about safeguarding the rights and lives of the individuals who depend on these resources for their livelihoods.